Inconstitucionalidad del artículo 206 del código civil

Cristina Fátima Saffie Kattan

doi:10.5354/rej.v0i19.36190

We remind our collaborators that Revista de Estudios de la Justicia maintains its reception of articles throughout the year.

In order to comply with our editorial deadlines, articles submitted before April 30 may be published in the upcoming July issue.

Unconstitutionality of Article 206 of the Civil Code

Authors

Cristina Fátima Saffie Kattan Abogada. Licenciada en ciencias jurídicas y sociales

No. 19 (2013): Segundo semestre

https://doi.org/10.5354/rej.v0i19.36190

Abstract

This paper aims to present some constitutional problems arising from the passage of Law 19.585, specifically problems concerning Article 206 of the Civil Code. Accordingly, the author describes the case law evolution and then tackles the relevant legal doctrine. The main issues under discussion are the following principles: the meaning of the right to identity; the recognition of the total equality of children born in- and outside of wedlock; the importance of the child's best interest principle and the role of the aforementioned Article 206. The author claims that if the statute of limitations of claiming inheritance rights has expired, proclaiming the unconstitutionality of Article 206 shouldn’t generate conflicts regarding inheritance rights of the heirs. Thus, this study concludes that Article 206 of the Civil Code should not be applied under any circumstances.

Keywords:

Claims of post mortem filiation, Civil Code’s norm 206

Downloads

Altmetrics

How to Cite

Saffie Kattan, C. F. (2015). Unconstitutionality of Article 206 of the Civil Code. Revista De Estudios De La Justicia, (19), pp. 159–172. https://doi.org/10.5354/rej.v0i19.36190

Unconstitutionality of Article 206 of the Civil Code

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

Downloads

Make a Submission

Language

Information

Developed By

Current Issue

indexado

publique