Las voces de la justicia: Comparación jurisdiccional entre los jueces y el jurado

Carlos Manuel Rosales; Raúl Alvarado Aguilera

doi:10.5354/0718-4735.2018.50374

The Revista de Estudios de la Justicia invites the submission of articles and case comments for its 2026 edition.
For further information, please visit: https://rej.uchile.cl/index.php/RECEJ/announcement/view/407

The voices of justice: Jurisdictional comparison between the judges and the jury

Authors

Carlos Manuel Rosales Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE)
Raúl Alvarado Aguilera Instituto de la Judicatura del Consejo del Poder Judicial del Estado de Michoacán

No. 28 (2018): Primer semestre

https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2018.50374

Download

PDF

Abstract

The present work will expose an analytical and functional comparison of the responsible in charge of giving justice, the Courts (composed by judges) and the jury (integrated by citizens). For what there will be showed its juridical natures, compositions and instruments of action, and to compare the functions of each them.

Keywords:

Jurisdiction , judges , judicial principles , jury

Altmetrics

How to Cite

Rosales, C. M., & Alvarado Aguilera, R. (2018). The voices of justice: Jurisdictional comparison between the judges and the jury. Revista De Estudios De La Justicia, (28). https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2018.50374

The voices of justice: Jurisdictional comparison between the judges and the jury

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

Make a Submission

Language

Information

Developed By

Current Issue

indexado

publique